ESG Risk Platform

I led product and design on a 0-to-1 ESG risk management platform built for investors, fund managers, and C-suite leaders.

The platform brings together four things that rarely exist in one place:


  • Climate transition modeling (so investors can stress-test portfolios),

  • Emissions tracking (Scope 1–3, automated),

  • Materiality assessment tools (to focus on what actually matters), and

  • A validator marketplace (to get ESG reports verified and build trust).

I was responsible for everything from research and user flows to product strategy and roadmap. This meant interviewing investors, running design sprints, mapping real workflows, and working with engineers to bring it all to life. We launched the MVP in under 4 months.

What makes this platform different isn’t just the feature set it’s the fact that it was built with real users in mind, people under pressure to report, respond, and make climate-driven decisions without the right tools. In early pilots, we saw ESG reporting time drop by nearly half, and portfolio teams finally had a way to run scenario risk without outsourcing it.

This case study is a walkthrough of how I built something new in a crowded, noisy space and how I kept it focused, useful, and scalable from day one.

I led product and design on a 0-to-1 ESG risk management platform built for investors, fund managers, and C-suite leaders. The idea came from a simple but growing need: most ESG tools today are fragmented, hard to use, and don’t actually help decision-makers make better calls around climate risk or compliance. I wanted to fix that.

The platform brings together four things that rarely exist in one place:

  • Climate transition modeling (so investors can stress-test portfolios),

  • Emissions tracking (Scope 1–3, automated),

  • Materiality assessment tools (to focus on what actually matters), and

  • A validator marketplace (to get ESG reports verified and build trust).

I was responsible for everything from research and user flows to product strategy and roadmap. This meant interviewing investors, running design sprints, mapping real workflows, and working with engineers to bring it all to life. We launched the MVP in under 6 months.

What makes this platform different isn’t just the feature set — it’s the fact that it was built with real users in mind: people under pressure to report, respond, and make climate-driven decisions without the right tools. In early pilots, we saw ESG reporting time drop by nearly half, and portfolio teams finally had a way to run scenario risk without outsourcing it.

This case study is a walkthrough of how I built something new in a crowded, noisy space — and how I kept it focused, useful, and scalable from day one.

My role

Product Designer & Product Manager (0→1 platform owner)

Duration

Duration

5 months

Location

Location

Bengaluru, India

Industry

Industry

Climate Tech

Challenge

ESG data is fragmented, hard to trust, and often not decision-grade. Fund managers, investors, and executives struggle with unreliable emissions data, static reports, and no clear way to model climate risk or validate disclosures. Our goal was to build a platform that brings everything under one roof metrics, modeling, materiality, and verification in a way that’s actually usable and aligned with how capital allocators think.

Results

The platform helped early users cut ESG reporting time in half and identify high-risk assets using climate transition modeling. Teams used the validator marketplace to add third-party assurance to their disclosures. Feedback from fund managers and sustainability leaders highlighted the platform’s clarity, credibility, and how it changed their ESG workflow from reactive to proactive.

2

Logistics companies onboarded during pilot phase, covering over 500 assets across operations.

5

Independent ESG validators onboarded to the marketplace for emissions and disclosure assurance.

92%

of users said the materiality module helped them focus on the most relevant ESG issues

Problem Space & User Needs

As ESG regulations accelerated, companies and investors faced growing pressure to report and act but the tools to do that were scattered, inconsistent, and often built for compliance, not decision-making.

We spoke to investors, fund managers, and sustainability leads across industries, and a few themes kept repeating.


Stakeholders

Anika Mehra, ESG-Focused Fund Manager

"I need reliable, comparable ESG data across my portfolio not PDFs and guesswork. I want to spot exposure early, run scenarios, and present a credible strategy to our LPs."


Carlos D’Souza, Chief Sustainability Officer


"We're juggling regulations, internal targets, and board expectations. I need one place to track emissions, validate data, and prioritize material topics for the business."


Maya Shah, Reporting Lead ESG & Compliance Team

"We’re juggling GRI, ISSB, CSRD, TCFD and client-specific formats on top of that. We need clarity on what to report, why it matters, and how to prioritize without starting from scratch every time."

Approach

  • Before starting product development, we conducted competitive analysis and market mapping across ESG reporting, climate modeling, and emissions tracking platforms. We looked at offerings from MSCI, Workiva, Watershed, and emerging players like Good.Lab to understand gaps in how current tools serve fund managers and sustainability teams.


  • In early research, we interviewed stakeholders across three segments: fund managers, sustainability leads, and reporting/compliance teams. These conversations helped us uncover critical pain points around fragmented ESG workflows, lack of scenario tools, and the overwhelming complexity of aligning with frameworks like GRI, CSRD, and TCFD.


  • We synthesized user needs by clustering feedback using affinity mapping and created three representative personas to guide product thinking. These helped us reframe the problem around trust, clarity, and actionability in ESG workflows not just reporting.


  • From there, we defined the MVP, prioritizing features that delivered immediate value, emissions measurement (Scope 1–3), a materiality module, and a lightweight scenario engine. We intentionally scoped the validator marketplace for pilot with a curated group of firms to test the verification workflow.


  • On the design side, we ran multiple design sprints and iterated on mid-fidelity prototypes in Figma. We tested key flows like onboarding, dashboard views, and validator workflows with early users. Based on feedback, we simplified navigation, added contextual help around climate scenarios, and built role-based dashboards for fund managers, CSOs, and execs.

Pilot Partners

We conducted our initial pilot with two organizations operating in the clean mobility and logistics space.

Blive is a quick commerce delivery partner platform focused on electric two-wheeler logistics. Their distributed fleet operations made them an ideal testing ground for our emissions tracking, ESG data collection, and validator integration features.

Good Energy, our sister company, provides fleet electrification solutions for enterprises. Their internal ESG and compliance teams helped us refine early workflows around transition modeling, framework alignment (like CSRD/GRI), and reporting clarity.

Contextual Inquiry

For this phase, we conducted 1:1 contextual interviews with sustainability leads, fund managers, and reporting officers from both pilot partners and external advisory networks. Our goal was to understand the real workflows, roadblocks, and expectations surrounding ESG measurement, emissions reporting, and audit readiness.

We carefully crafted our questions to explore how teams currently track emissions, navigate frameworks (like GRI, CSRD, ISSB), and manage validation. These conversations revealed deep frustration with disconnected tools, Excel-heavy processes, and the difficulty of translating ESG data into board-level insights.

Affinity Mapping


We mapped out our interview insights using digital sticky notes in FigJam. Individual observations were grouped into local affinity clusters based on recurring themes such as emissions tracking, framework fatigue, and validation workflows. These clusters were then organized into a structured three-layer affinity map to surface broader behavioral patterns, pain points, and emerging opportunities across user roles.

Affinity Diagram

Key findings

Need to build an OTA platform that excels at building trust through storytelling, reviews, and visual design.

Common gap: All platforms have complex workflows for small property owners, making onboarding overwhelming.

Key findings

“Scope 3 emissions are a black box. We know they matter, but we don’t know how to measure them reliably.”

“Third-party validation is valuable, but coordinating with auditors is slow, messy, and expensive.”

“Materiality changes year to year. We need a faster, more collaborative way to re-prioritize what’s important.”

“Everyone’s using different frameworks we’re constantly mapping GRI to ISSB to TCFD for different stakeholders.”

Key findings

Need to build an OTA platform that excels at building trust through storytelling, reviews, and visual design.

Common gap: All platforms have complex workflows for small property owners, making onboarding overwhelming.

Creating a design system

I collaborated closely with the development team to build a scalable, component-driven design system using Next.js and Tailwind CSS. We established a shared token structure for color, spacing, and typography to ensure consistency across the platform including dashboards, validator workflows, and emissions reports. The system was modular, fully responsive, and optimized for reusability, allowing us to scale quickly while maintaining visual and functional coherence.

Final Designs

Carbon Footprint & Risk Intelligence


This feature is designed to help organizations establish a clear emissions baseline across their operations the foundation for any ESG transition strategy.

What It Does

  • Calculates your organization’s annual carbon emissions (Scope 1, 2, or 3)

  • Highlights cost and fuel hotspots across operations

  • Scores environmental risk based on intensity, exposure, and compliance factors

  • Breaks down emissions by asset, region, or category for targeted insights

  • Flags policy risks tied to location or industry

Simulate Transition


Helps users explore transition scenarios from fossil-fuel assets to sustainable alternatives and understand their long-term impact.

What It Does

  • Lets users configure how much of a category (e.g., cars, trucks, buildings) they want to transition

  • Surfaces costs vs. projected fuel savings dynamically

  • Shows environmental impact: CO₂ reduction, trees saved, fuel conserved

  • Includes a leasing vs. purchase toggle for financial comparison

  • Timeline slider helps simulate ROI over multiple years

  • Adds a Carbon Credit Readiness flag for offset markets

ESG Report Builder – MRV-Linked Input


This module lets users input or validate ESG data points in this case, fleet emission intensity pulled from automated MRV (Monitoring, Reporting, Verification) pipelines.

What It Does

  • Auto-fetches emissions data via MRV integrations

  • Allows manual override or confirmation for regulatory reporting

  • Tracks data provenance (ownership, documents, methodology)

  • Organizes disclosures by reporting framework (e.g., SASB, GRI, CSRD)

Conclusion

Future Directions

With core functionality for emissions tracking and transition modeling in place and initial pilots validating usability in the mobility sector the next phase focuses on deeper testing and broader ESG coverage:


  • Cross-Sector Validation
    Expand pilot testing beyond logistics and mobility to sectors like manufacturing, retail, and finance to ensure platform adaptability across different ESG risk profiles and data environments.

  • Enhanced Social Metrics Tracking
    Introduce features to track workforce diversity, employee well-being, community impact, and labor practices aligned with global frameworks like GRI and CSRD’s Social disclosures.


  • Governance Module Development
    Build tools for capturing board composition, policy disclosures, anti-corruption practices, and compliance workflows helping users strengthen internal governance visibility and risk controls.

Recognition
Awarded Employee of the Month for leading cross-functional development and pilot rollout of the ESG platform recognized for delivering measurable outcomes in a fast-paced 0→1 product environment..